Grid plan

Posted by admin on August 14, 2018 in Uncategorized |

The grid plan, grid street plan, or gridiron plan is a type of city plan in which streets run at right angles to each other, forming a grid. The infrastructure cost for regular grid patterns is generally higher than for patterns with discontinuous streets.

Costs for streets depend largely on four variables: street width, street length, block width and pavement width. Two inherent characteristics of the grid plan, frequent intersections and orthogonal geometry, facilitate pedestrian movement. The geometry helps with orientation and wayfinding and its frequent intersections with the choice and directness of route to desired destinations.

In ancient Rome, the grid plan method of land measurement was called centuriation. The grid plan dates from antiquity and originated in multiple cultures; some of the earliest planned cities were built using grid plans.

By 2600 BC, Mohenjo-daro and Harappa, major cities of the Indus Valley Civilization (in what is now Pakistan), were built with blocks divided by a grid of straight streets, running north-south and east-west. Each block was subdivided by small lanes. The cities and monasteries of Gandhara (e.g. Sirkap and Taxila), dating from the 1st millennium BC to the 11th century AD, also had grid-based designs. Islamabad, the capital of Pakistan since 1959, was also founded on the grid-plan of the nearby ruined city of Sirkap.

A workers’ village (2570-2500 BC) at Giza, Egypt, housed a rotating labor force and was laid out in blocks of long galleries separated by streets in a formal grid. Many pyramid-cult cities used a common orientation: a north-south axis from the royal palace and an east-west axis from the temple, meeting at a central plaza where King and God merged and crossed.

Hammurabi king of the Babylonian Empire in the 17th century BC, ordered the rebuilding of Babylon: constructing and restoring temples, city walls, public buildings, and irrigation canals. The streets of Babylon were wide and straight, intersected approximately at right angles, and were paved with bricks and bitumen.

The tradition of grid plans is continuous in China from the 15th century BC onward in the traditional urban planning of various ancient Chinese states. Guidelines put into written form in the Kaogongji during the Spring and Autumn period (770-476 BC) stated: “a capital city should be square on plan. Three gates on each side of the perimeter lead into the nine main streets that crisscross the city and define its grid-pattern. And for its layout the city should have the Royal Court situated in the south, the Marketplace in the north, the Imperial Ancestral Temple in the east and the Altar to the Gods of Land and Grain in the west.”

Teotihuacan, near modern-day Mexico City, is the largest ancient grid-plan site in the Americas. The city’s grid covered 21 square kilometres(8 square miles).

Perhaps the most well-known grid system is that spread through the colonies of the Roman Empire. The archetypal Roman Grid was introduced to Italy first by the Greeks, with such information transferred by way of trade and conquest.

Although the idea of the grid was present in Hellenic societal and city planning, it was not pervasive prior to the 5th century BC. However, it slowly gained primacy through the work of Hippodamus of Miletus, who planned and replanned many Greek cities in accordance with this form. The concept of a grid as the ideal method of town planning had become widely accepted by the time of Alexander the Great. His conquests were a step in the propagation of the grid plan throughout colonies, some as far-flung as Taxila in Pakistan, that would later be mirrored by the expansion of the Roman Empire. The Greek grid had its streets aligned roughly in relation to the cardinal points and generally looked to take advantage of visual cues based on the hilly landscape typical of Greece and Asia Minor. This was probably best exemplified in Priene, in present-day western Turkey, where the orthogonal city grid was based on the cardinal points, on sloping terrain that struck views out[clarification needed] towards a river and the city of Miletus.

The Etruscan people, whose territories in Italy encompassed what would eventually become Rome, founded what is now the city of Marzabotto at the end of the 6th century BC. Its layout was based on Greek Ionic ideas, and it was here that the main east-west and north-south axes of a town (the decumanus maximus and cardo maximus respectively) could first be seen in Italy. According to Stanislawski (1946), the Romans did use grids until the time of the late Republic or early Empire, when they introduced centuriation, a system which they spread around the Mediterranean and into northern Europe later on.

The military expansion of this period facilitated the adoption of the grid form as standard: the Romans established castra (forts or camps) first as military centres; some of them developed into administrative hubs. The Roman grid was similar in form to the Greek version of a grid, but allowed for practical considerations. For example, Roman castra were often sited on flat land, especially close to or on important nodes like river crossings or intersections of trade routes. The dimensions of the castra were often standard, with each of its four walls generally having a length of 660 metres (2,150 ft). Familiarity was the aim of such standardisation: soldiers could be stationed anywhere around the Empire, and orientation would be easy within established towns if they had a standard layout. Each would have the aforementioned decumanus maximus and cardo maximus at its heart, and their intersection would form the forum, around which would be sited important public buildings. Indeed, such was the degree of similarity between towns that Higgins states that soldiers “would be housed at the same address as they moved from castra to castra“. Pompeii has been cited by both Higgins and Laurence[not in citation given] as the best preserved example of the Roman grid.

Outside of the castra, large tracts of land were also divided in accordance with the grid within the walls. These were typically 730 metres (2,400 ft) per side (called centuria), and contained 100 parcels of land (each called heredium). The decumanus maximus and cardo maximus extended from the town gates out towards neighbouring settlements. These were lined up to be as straight as possible, only deviating from their path due to natural obstacles that prevented a direct route.

While the imposition of only one town form regardless of region could be seen as an imposition of imperial authority, there is no doubting the practical reasoning behind the formation of the Roman grid. Under Roman guidance, the grid was designed for efficiency and interchangeability, both facilitated by and aiding the expansion of their empire.

As Japan and the Korean peninsula became politically centralized in the 7th century AD, those societies adopted Chinese grid-planning principles in numerous locations. In Korea, Gyeongju, the capital of Unified Silla, and Sanggyeong, the capital of Balhae, adapted the Tang Dynasty Chinese model. The ancient capitals of Japan, such as Fujiwara-Kyô (AD 694-710), Nara (Heijô-Kyô, AD 710-784), and Kyoto (Heian-Kyô, AD 794-1868) also adapted from Tang’s capital, Chang’an. However, for reasons of defense, the planners of Tokyo eschewed the grid, opting instead for an irregular network of streets surrounding the Edo Castle grounds. In later periods, some parts of Tokyo were grid-planned, but grid plans are generally rare in Japan, and the Japanese addressing system is accordingly based on increasingly fine subdivisions, rather than a grid.

The grid-planning tradition in Asia continued through the beginning of the 20th century, with Sapporo, Japan (est. 1868) following a grid plan under American influence.

New European towns were planned using grids beginning in the 12th century, most prodigiously in the bastides of southern France that were built during the 13th and 14th centuries. Medieval European new towns using grid plans were widespread, ranging from Wales to the Florentine region. Many were built on ancient grids originally established as Roman colonial outposts.

The Roman model was also used in Spanish settlements during the Reconquista of Ferdinand and Isabella. It was subsequently applied in the new cities established during the Spanish colonization of the Americas, after the founding of San Cristóbal de La Laguna (Canary Islands) in 1496. In 1573, King Phillip II of Spain compiled the to guide the construction and administration of colonial communities. The Laws specified a square or rectangular central plaza with eight principal streets running from the plaza’s corners. Hundreds of grid-plan communities throughout the Americas were established according to this pattern, echoing the practices of earlier Indian civilizations.

The baroque capital city of Malta, Valletta, dating back to the 16th Century, was built following a rigid grid plan of uniformly designed houses, dotted with palaces, churches and squares.

The grid plan became popular with the start of the Renaissance in Northern Europe. In 1606, the newly founded city of Mannheim in Germany was the first Renaissance city laid out on the grid plan. Later came the New Town in Edinburgh and almost the entire city centre of Glasgow, and many planned communities and cities in Australia, Canada and the United States.

Derry, constructed in 1613–1618, was the first planned city in Ireland. The central diamond within a walled city with four gates was considered a good design for defence. The grid pattern was widely copied in the colonies of British North America.

In Russia the first planned city was St. Petersburg founded in 1703 by Peter I. Being aware of the modern European construction experience which he examined in the years of his Grand Embassy to Europe, czar ordered Domenico Trezzini to elaborate the first general plan of the city. The project of this architect for Vasilyevsky Island was a typical rectangular grid of streets (originally intended to be canals, like in Amsterdam), with three lengthwise thoroughfares, rectangularly crossed with about 30 crosswise streets.

The shape of street blocks on Vasilyevsky Island is the same, as was later implemented in the Commissioners’ Plan of 1811 for Manhattan: elongated rectangles. The longest side of each block faces the relatively narrow street with a numeric name (in Petersburg they are called Liniya (Line)) while the shortest side faces wide avenues. To denote avenues in Petersburg, a special term prospekt was introduced. Inside the grid of Vasilyevsky Island there are three prospekts, named Bolshoi (Big), Sredniy (Middle) and Maly (Small) while the far ends of each lines cross with the embankments of Bolshaya Neva and Smolenka rivers in the delta of the Neva River.

The peculiarity of ‘lines’ (streets) naming in this grid is that are each side of street has its own number, so one ‘line’ is a side of a street, not the whole street. The numbering is latently zero-based, however the supposed “zero line” has its proper name Kadetskaya liniya, while the opposite side of this street is called the ‘1-st Line’. Next street is named the ‘2-nd Line’ on the eastern side, and the ‘3-rd Line’ on the western side. After the reorganization of house numbering in 1834 and 1858 the even house numbers are used on the odd-numbered lines, and respectively odd house numbers are used for the even-numbered lines. The maximum numbers for ‘lines’ in Petersburg are 28-29th lines.

Later in the middle of the 18th century another grid of rectangular blocks with the numbered streets appeared in the continental part of the city: 13 streets named from the ‘1-st Rota’ up to the ’13-th Rota’, where the companies (German: Rotte, Russian: рота) of the Izmaylovsky Regiment were located.

Many of the earliest cities in the United States, such as Boston, did not start with a grid system. However, even in pre-revolutionary days some cities saw the benefits of such a layout. New Haven Colony, one of the earliest colonies in America, was designed with a tiny 9-square grid at its founding in 1638. On a grander scale, Philadelphia was designed on a rectilinear street grid in 1682: one of the first cities in North America to use a grid system. At the urging of city founder William Penn, surveyor Thomas Holme designed a system of wide streets intersecting at right angles between the Schuylkill River to the west and the Delaware River to the east, including five squares of dedicated parkland. Penn advertised this orderly design as a safeguard against overcrowding, fire, and disease, which plagued European cities. Holme drafted an ideal version of the grid, but alleyways sprouted within and between larger blocks as the city took shape. Arguably the most famous grid plan in history is the plan for New York City formulated in the Commissioners’ Plan of 1811, a visionary proposal by the state legislature of New York for the development of most of Manhattan above Houston Street.

Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States, was planned under French-American architect Pierre Charles L’Enfant. Under the L’Enfant plan, the original District of Columbia was developed using a grid plan that is interrupted by diagonal avenues, most famously Pennsylvania Avenue. These diagonals are often connected by traffic circles, such as Dupont Circle and Washington Circle. As the city grew, the plan was duplicated to cover most of the remainder of the capital. Meanwhile, the core of the city faced disarray and the McMillan Plan, led by Senator James McMillan, was adopted to build a National Mall and a parks system that is still today a jewel of the city.

Often, some of the streets in a grid are numbered (First, Second, etc.), lettered, or arranged in alphabetical order. Downtown San Diego uses all three schemes: north-south streets are numbered from west to east, and east-west streets are split between a lettered series running southward from A through L and a series of streets named after trees or plants, running northward alphabetically from Ash to Walnut. As in many cities, some of these streets have been given new names violating the system (the former D Street is now Broadway, the former 12th Avenue is now Park Boulevard, etc.); this has meant that 2nd, not 1st, is the most common street name in the United States.

An exception to the typical, uniform grid is the plan of Savannah, Georgia (1733), known as the Oglethorpe Plan. It is a composite, cellular city block consisting of four large corner blocks, four small blocks in between and a public square in the centre; the entire composition of approximately ten acres (four hectares) is known as a ward. Its cellular structure includes all the primary land uses of a neighborhood and has for that reason been called fractal. Its street configuration presages modern traffic calming techniques applied to uniform grids where certain selected streets become discontinuous or narrow, thus discouraging through traffic. The configuration also represents an example of functional shared space, where pedestrian and vehicular traffic can safely and comfortably coexist.

In the westward development of the United States, the use of the grid plan was nearly universal in the construction of new settlements, such as in Salt Lake City (1870), Dodge City (1872) and Oklahoma City (1890). In these western cities the streets were numbered even more carefully than in the east to suggest future prosperity and metropolitan status.

One of the main advantages of the grid plan was that it allowed the rapid subdivision and auction of a large parcel of land. For example, when the legislature of the Republic of Texas decided in 1839 to move the capital to a new site along the Colorado River, the functioning of the government required the rapid population of the town, which was named Austin. Charged with the task, Edwin Waller designed a fourteen-block grid that fronted the river on 640 acres (exactly 1 square mile; about 2.6 km²). After surveying the land, Waller organized the almost immediate sale of 306 lots, and by the end of the year the entire Texas government had arrived by oxcart at the new site. Apart from the speed of surveying advantage, the rationale at the time of the grid’s adoption in this and other cities remains obscure.

Ildefonso Cerdá, a Spanish civil engineer, defined a concept of urban planning, based on the grid, that he applied to the Eixample of Barcelona. The Eixample grid introduced innovative design elements which were exceptional at the time and even unique among subsequent grid plans:

These innovations he based on functional grounds: the block size, to enable the creation of a quiet interior open space (60 m by 60 m) and allow ample sunlight and ventilation to its perimeter buildings; the rectilinear geometry, the wide streets and boulevards to sustain high mobility and the truncated corners to facilitate turning of carts and coaches and particularly vehicles on fixed rails.

In maps of larger American cities the downtown areas are almost always grids. These areas represent the original land dimensions of the founded city, generally around one square mile. Some cities expanded the grid further out from the centre, but maps also show that, in general, as the distance from the centre increases, a variety of patterns emerge in no particular discernible order. In juxtaposition to the grid they appear random. These new patterns have been systematically classified and their design characteristics measured.

In the United States, the grid system was widely used in most major cities and their suburbs until the 1960s. However, during the 1920s, the rapid adoption of the automobile caused a panic among urban planners, who, based on observation, claimed that speeding cars would eventually kill tens of thousands of small children per year. Apparently, at this early stage of the car’s entry into the grid, the streets of major cities worldwide were the scene of virtual “slaughter” as the fatality rate in proportion to population was more than double the current rate. In 2009, after several decades of road safety improvements and a continuous decline in fatalities, an estimated 33,963 people died in motor vehicle traffic crashes and, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children from 3 to 14 years old.” Planners, therefore, called for an inwardly focused “superblock” arrangement that minimized through automobile traffic and discouraged cars from traveling on anything but arterial roads; traffic generators, such as apartment complexes and shops, would be restricted to the edges of the superblock, along the arterial. This paradigm prevailed between about 1930 and 1960, especially in Los Angeles, where notable examples include Leimert Park (an early example) and Panorama City (a late-period one).

A prominent 20th century urbanist, Lewis Mumford, severely criticized some of the grid’s characteristics: “With a T-square and a triangle, finally, the municipal engineer could, without the slightest training as either an architect or a sociologist, ‘plan’ a metropolis, with its standard lots, its standard blocks, its standard street widths, in short, with its standardized comparable, and replaceable parts. The new gridiron plans were spectacular in their inefficiency and waste. By usually failing to discriminate sufficiently between main arteries and residential streets, the first were not made wide enough while the second were usually too wide for purely neighborhood functions… as for its contribution to the permanent social functions of the city, the anonymous gridiron plan proved empty.”

In the 1960s, traffic engineers and urban planners abandoned the grid virtually wholesale in favor of a “street hierarchy”. This is a thoroughly “asymmetric” street arrangement in which a residential subdivision—often surrounded by a noise wall or a security gate—is completely separated from the road network except for one or two connections to arterial roads. In a way, this is a return to medieval styles: as noted in Spiro Kostof’s seminal history of urban design, The City Shaped, there is a strong resemblance between the street arrangements of modern American suburbs and those of medieval Arab and Moorish cities. In each case, the community unit at hand—the clan or extended family in the Muslim world, the economically homogeneous subdivision in modern suburbia—isolates itself from the larger urban scene by using dead ends and culs-de-sac.

One famous grid system is in the British new town of Milton Keynes. In this planned city, which began construction in 1967, a system of ten “horizontal” (roughly east-west) and eleven “vertical” (roughly north-south) roads was used, with roundabouts at each intersection. The horizontal roads were all given names ending in ‘way’ and H numbers (for ‘horizontal’, e.g. H3 Monks Way). The vertical roads were given names ending in ‘street’ and V numbers (for ‘vertical’, e.g. V6 Grafton Street). Each grid road was spaced roughly one kilometre along from the next, forming squares of approximately one square kilometre. Each square and each roundabout was given its own name. The system provided very easy transport within the city, although it confused visitors who were unfamiliar with the system. The grid squares thus formed are far larger than the city blocks described earlier, and the road layouts within the grid squares are generally ‘organic’ in form – matching the street hierarchy model described above.

Street width, or right of way (ROW), influences the amount of land that is devoted to streets, which becomes unavailable for development and therefore represents an opportunity cost. The wider the street the higher the opportunity cost. Street width is determined by circulation and aesthetic considerations and is not dependent on the pattern configuration. Any configuration can have wide or narrow streets.

Street length influences proportionately the amount of street components that have to be constructed such as pavement, curbs and sidewalks, storm sewers and drains, light poles, and trees. The street length of a given area of development depends on the frequency at which streets occur which in turn depends on the length and width of a block. The higher the frequency of streets the longer is their total length. The smaller the block dimensions the higher the frequency of the streets. As the frequency of street increases so does the number of intersections. Intersections normally cost more than straight street length because they are labour-intensive and require street and traffic signage.

Pavement width influences the cost by affecting the amount of materials and labour required to provide a finished road surface. Pavement width is generally based on traffic engineering considerations and is not dependent on pattern configuration. As with the street width, any pattern can have wide or narrow pavements. Of all three factors that affect cost, street width, street length and pavement width, only street length is pattern dependent. An objective cost comparison would, therefore, rely on this variable with the full understanding that the other variables, though optional, can play a role.

Traditional orthogonal grid patterns generally have greater street frequencies than discontinuous patterns. For example, Portland’s block is 200 feet × 200 feet while Miletus’ is half that size and Timgad’s half again (see diagram). Houston, Sacramento and Barcelona are progressively bigger reaching up to four times the area of Portland’s block. New York’s 1811 plan (see above) has blocks of 200 feet (61 m). in width and variable lengths ranging from about 500 to 900 feet. The corresponding frequency of streets for each of these block sizes affects the street length.

A simple example of a grid street pattern (see diagram) illustrates the progressive reduction in total street length (the sum of all individual street lengths) and the corresponding increase in block length. For a corresponding reduction of one, two, three and four streets within this 40-acre (16 ha) parcel, the street length is reduced from an original total of 12,600 to 7,680 linear feet, a 39% reduction. Simultaneously, block lengths increase from 200 × 200 feet to 1240 × 200 feet. When all five blocks have reached the ultimate size of 1,240 feet (380 m) four street lengths out of total eight have been eliminated. Block lengths of 1000 feet or larger rarely appear in grid plans and are not recommended as they hinder pedestrian movement (Pedestrianism, below). From the pedestrian perspective, the smaller the block is, the easier the navigation and the more direct the route. Consequently, the finer grids are preferred.

Patterns that incorporate discontinuous street types such as crescents and culs-de-sac have not, in general, regarded pedestrian movement as a priority and, consequently, have produced blocks that are usually in the 1000-foot range and often exceed it. As a result, street frequency drops and so does the total street length and, therefore, the cost. In general, it is not the street pattern per se that affects costs but the frequency of streets that it either necessitates or purposely incorporates.

An inherent advantage of the orthogonal geometry of a proper grid is its tendency to yield regular lots in well-packed sequences. This maximizes the use of the land of the block; it does not, however, affect street frequency. Any frequency of orthogonal streets produces the same packing effect. Orthogonal geometry also minimizes disputes over lot boundaries and maximizes the number of lots that could front a given street. John Randal said Manhattan’s grid plan facilitated “buying, selling and improving real estate”.

Another important aspect of street grids and the use of rectilinear blocks is that traffic flows of either pedestrians, cars, or both, only cross at right angles. This is an important traffic safety feature, since no one entering the intersection needs to look over their shoulder to see oncoming traffic. Any time traffic flows meet at an acute angle, someone cannot see traffic approaching them. The grid is thus a geometric response to our human physiology. It is very likely the original purpose of grid layouts comes from the Athenian Agora. Before the grid organization, markets were laid out randomly in a field with traffic approaches at odd angles. This caused carts and wagons to turn over due to frequent collisions. Laying out the market stalls into regularized rows at right angles solved this problem and was later built into the Athenian Agora and copied ever since.

Typical uniform grids are unresponsive to topography. Priene’s plan, for example, is set on a hill side and most of its north-south streets are stepped, a feature that would have made them inaccessible to carts, chariots and loaded animals. Many modern cities, such as San Francisco, Vancouver, and Saint John, New Brunswick, follow Priene’s example, e.g.. In a modern context, steep grades limit accessibility by car, and more so by bicycle, on foot, or wheelchair, particularly in cold climates.

The same inflexibility of the grid leads to disregarding environmentally sensitive areas such as small streams and creeks or mature woodlots in preference for the application of the immutable geometry. It is said of the NY grid plan that it flattened all obstacles in its way. By contrast, recent discontinuous street patterns follow the configuration of natural features without disrupting them. The grid represents a rationalist, reductionist solution to a multifaceted issue.

The grid’s inherent high street and intersection frequencies produce large areas of impermeable surfaces in the street pavement and the sidewalks. In comparison to recent networks with discontinuous street types, grids can be up to 30% higher in impermeable surfaces attributable to roads. The emerging environmental priority of retaining as much as 90% of rain water on site becomes problematic with high percentages of impermeable surfaces. And since roads constitute the largest share of the total impermeable surfaces of a development, the difficulty is compounded by the grid type of layout. For these reasons modern planners have attempted to modify the rigid, uniform, classic grid.

Some cities, notably Seattle, have devised means to improve a street’s retention capacity. However, frequent intersections as they occur in a regular grid would pose an obstacle to their effective application.

A street network pattern can affect the production of pollutants by the amount of car travel that it necessitates and the speed at which cars can travel. The grid plan with its frequent intersections may displace a portion of the local car trips with walking or biking due to the directness of route that it offers to pedestrians. But it also makes the same routes more direct for cars, which could be an enticement for driving. The potential car trip displacement would result in a reduction of pollutant emissions. The advantage of the intersection density for pedestrians, however, can have a contrary effect for cars due to its potential for reducing speeds. Low speeds below 20 mph have a significantly higher coefficient of pollutant production than above 30, though the coefficient after leveling off tends to increase gradually after 50 mph. This effect is accentuated with high traffic density in areas with commercial uses where speeds come to a crawl. Since the grid plan is non-hierarchical and intersections are frequent, all streets can be subject to this potential reduction of average speeds, leading to a high production of pollutants. Greenhouse and noxious gases can be detrimental to the environment and to resident health.

In his seminal study (1982) on livable streets that was conducted in neighbourhoods with a grid, Donald Appleyard showed that social networking and street playing degraded as traffic increased on a street. His research provided the groundwork for traffic calming and for several initiatives such as living streets and Home Zones, all of which are aimed at improving a street’s social milieu. The amount of traffic on a street depends on variables such as the population density of the neighbourhood, car ownership and its proximity to commercial, institutional or recreational edifices. Most importantly, however, it depends on whether a street is or could become a through road to a destination. As a through road, it could sustain unpredictable levels of traffic that may fluctuate during the day and increase over time.

A key characteristic of the grid pattern is that any and all streets are equally accessible to traffic (non-hierarchical) and could be chosen at will as alternative routes to a destination. Cut-through driving, or shortcutting, has been resisted by residents. Cities responded by making modifications to prevent it. Current recommended design practice suggests the use of 3-way intersections to alleviate it.

The geometry of the normal, open grid is evidently unsuitable for protecting or enhancing the social environment of a street from the negative influence of traffic. Similarly, a 1972 ground-breaking study by Oscar Newman on a Defensible Space Theory described ways to improve the social environment and security of neighbourhoods and streets. In a practical application of his theory at Five Oaks, the neighbourhood’s grid pattern was modified to prevent through traffic and create identifiable smaller enclaves while maintaining complete pedestrian freedom of movement. The positive outcome of these changes reinforces Appleyard’s findings and the need to reduce or prevent through traffic on neighbourhood streets; a need that cannot be met with a typical, uniform, open grid.

The question of neighbourhood security has been a constant focus of research since Oscar Newman’s work. New research has expanded the discussion on this disputed issue. A recent study did extensive spatial analysis and correlated several building, site plan and social factors with crime frequencies and identified subtle nuances to the contrasting positions. The study looked at, among others, dwelling types, unit density (site density) movement on the street, culs–de-sac or grids and the permeability of a residential area. Among its conclusions are, respectively, that flats are always safer than houses and the wealth of inhabitants matters, density is generally beneficial but more so at ground level, local movement is beneficial, but not larger scale movement, relative affluence and the number of neighbours have a greater effect than either being on a cul-de-sac or being on a through street. It also re-established that simple, linear culs-de-sac with good numbers of dwellings that are joined to through streets tend to be safe. As for permeability, it suggests that residential areas should be permeable enough to allow movement in all directions but no more. The overprovision of poorly used permeability is a crime hazard. The open, uniform grid could be seen as an example of undifferentiated permeability.

A recent study in California examined the amount of child play that occurred on the streets of neighbourhoods with different characteristics; grid pattern and culs-de-sac. The findings indicate that the open grid streets showed substantially lower play activity than the cul-de-sac street type. Culs-de-sac reduce perceived danger from traffic thereby encouraging more outdoor play. It pointed the way toward the development of hybrid street network patterns that improve pedestrian movement but restrict cut-through driving. Similar studies in Europe and most recently in Australia found that children’s outdoor play is significantly reduced on through roads where traffic is, or perceived by parents to be, a risk.

Traditional street functions such as kids’ play, strolling and socializing are incompatible with traffic flow, which the open, uniform grid geometry encourages. For these reasons, cities such as Berkeley, California, and Vancouver, British Columbia, among many others, transformed existing residential streets part of a grid plan into permeable, linked culs-de-sac. This transformation retains the permeability and connectivity of the grid for the active modes of transport but filters and restricts car traffic on the cul-de-sac street to residents only.

Street networks of old cities that grew organically, though admired for being picturesque, can be confusing for visitors but rarely for the original inhabitants (see plan). Similarly confusing to visitors are the plans of modern subdivisions with discontinuous and curvilinear streets. Change of street orientation, particularly when gradual or arbitrary, cannot be “mapped” in the mind. Impasses, crescents or cul-de-sacs frustrate the traveler especially when they are long, forcing an arduous retracing of steps.

Frequency of intersections, however, becomes also a disadvantage for pedestrians and bicycles. It disrupts the relaxed canter of walking and forces pedestrians repeatedly onto the road, a hostile, anxiety-generating territory. People with physical limitations or frailties, children and seniors for example, can find a regular walk challenging. For bicycles this disadvantage is accentuated as their normal speed is at least double that of pedestrians. Frequent stops negate the speed advantage and the physical benefit of bicycling and add to frustration.[citation needed] Intersections are not only unpleasant but also dangerous. Most traffic collisions and injuries occur at intersections and the majority of the injuries to pedestrians crossing with the right of way.

A dilemma arises from trying to meet important planning objectives when using the grid: pedestrianism, cost efficiency and environmental responsiveness. To serve pedestrians well, a rectangular configuration and high frequency of streets and intersections is the preferred route, which the orthogonal grid geometry provides. To reduce development costs and environmental impact, lower frequency of streets is the logical path. Since these two design objectives are contradictory a balance needs to be struck. Such balance has been achieved in leading modern projects such as Vauban, Freiburg and Village Homes, Davis. Both score high in pedestrian and bike mode share and, at the same time, in reducing negative development externalities. Their layout configurations represent a fusion of the classic grid plan with recent street network patterns.

Examining the issue of walkability, a recent comparison of seven neighbourhood layouts found a 43 and 32 percent increase in walking with respect to a grid plan and conventional suburban layout in a fused grid layout, which has greater permeability for pedestrians than for cars due to its inclusion of dedicated pedestrian paths. It also showed a 7 to 10 percent range of reduction in driving with respect to the remainder six neighbourhood layouts in the set, an environmental benefit.

Perceived and actual safety play a role in the use of the street. Perceived safety, though perhaps an inaccurate reflection of the number of injuries or fatalities, influences parents’ decision to allow their children to play, walk or bike on the street. Actual levels of safety as measured by the total number of collisions and the number and severity of injuries are a matter of public concern. Both should inform the layout, if the street network is to achieve its optimum use.

Recent studies have found higher traffic fatality rates in outlying suburban areas than in central cities and inner suburbs with smaller blocks and more-connected street patterns. While some of this disparity is the result of distance from emergency medical facilities (hospitals are usually built in a fairly late stage of the development of a suburban area), it is clear[citation needed] that the lower speeds encouraged by the frequency of intersections decrease the severity of accidents occurring on streets within a grid plan.

An earlier study found significant differences in recorded accidents between residential neighbourhoods that were laid out on a grid and those that included culs-de-sac and crescents. The frequency of accidents was significantly higher in the grid neighbourhoods.

Two newer studies examined the frequency of collisions in two regional districts using the latest analytical tools. They investigated the potential correlation between street network patterns and frequency of collisions. In one study, cul-de-sac networks appeared to be much safer than grid networks, by nearly three to one. A second study found the grid plan to be the least safe by a significant margin with respect to all other street patterns.

A 2009 study suggests that land use patterns play a significant role in traffic safety and should be considered in conjunction with the network pattern. While all intersection types in general reduce the incidence of fatal crashes, four-way intersections, which occur regularly in a grid, increase total and injurious crashes significantly. The study recommends hybrid street networks with dense concentrations of T-intersections and concludes that a return to the 19th century gridiron is undesirable.

Stringent adherence to the grid plan can cause steep inclines since the topology of the land is not taken into account. This may be unsafe for drivers, pedestrians and bicycles since it is more difficult to control speed and braking, particularly in winter conditions.

One of the greatest difficulties with grid plans is their lack of specialisation, most of the important amenities being concentrated along the city’s main arteries. Often grid plans are found in linear settlements, with a main street connecting between the perpendicular roads. However, this can be mitigated by allowing mixed use development so that destinations become closer to home. Many cities, especially in Latin America, still successfully retain their grid plans. Recently, planners in the United States and Canada have revisited the idea of reintroducing grid patterns to many cities and towns.


Матч всех звёзд женской НБА 2017 года

Posted by admin on August 14, 2018 in Uncategorized |

Матч всех звёзд женской НБА 2017 года (англ. 2017 WNBA All-Star Game) — ежегодная показательная баскетбольная игра, прошедшая в субботу, 22 июля 2017 года, в Сиэтле (штат Вашингтон) на домашней арене команды «Сиэтл Шторм» «Ки-арена». Эта встреча стала четырнадцатым матчем всех звёзд (ASG) в истории женской национальной баскетбольной ассоциации (ВНБА) и первым, проведённым в Сиэтле. Встреча транслировалась кабельным спортивным каналом ESPN на телевизионном канале ABC (в формате HD TV) в 3:30 по Североамериканскому восточному времени (ET), а арбитрами на матче работали Билли Смит, Тиара Крус и Тиффани Бёрд.

Сборная Запада под руководством Шерил Рив в напористой борьбе переиграла команду Востока Курта Миллера со счётом 130:121, тем самым увеличив счёт в их противостоянии (10:4). Первые 6 игр всех звёзд женской НБА неизменно выигрывала сборная Запада, две следующие остались за Востоком, а затем победы стали чередоваться, следующую выиграла сборная Запада, через одну опять же команда Востока, в последних двух играх победил Запад. Самым ценным игроком этого матча была признана Майя Мур, представляющая на нём клуб «Миннесота Линкс», которая заслужила это звание во второй игре подряд, тем самым повторив достижения Лизы Лесли (2001 и 2002) и Свин Кэш (2009 и 2011).

Игроки стартовых пятёрок матча всех звёзд женской НБА выбираются по итогам электронного голосования, проводимого среди болельщиков на официальном сайте лиги — Выбор баскетболисток резервного состава сборных Востока и Запада проводится путём голосования среди главных тренеров клубов, входящих в конференцию, причём они не могут голосовать за своих собственных подопечных. До 2013 года наставники могли выбрать двух защитников, двух форвардов, одного центрового и ещё двух игроков вне зависимости от их амплуа. В 2014 году позиции форварда и центрового были объединены в единую категорию нападения, после чего наставники команд стали голосовать за двух защитников, трёх игроков нападения и одного игрока независимо от позиции. Если та или иная баскетболистка не может участвовать в ASG из-за травмы или по болезни, то их заменяют специально отобранные для этого резервисты.

По правилам женской НБА на тренерский мостик сборных Востока и Запада назначаются тренеры клубов, участвовавших в финале прошедшего сезона, исключением являлись игры всех звёзд 1999 и 2009 годов. Впрочем уже с сезона 2016 года повторно был изменён формат турнира навылет, согласно которого по два лучших клуба регулярки, к тому же оба из Западной конференции, напрямую прошли в полуфинал, а оставшиеся шесть разыгрывали между собой ещё две путёвки. В полуфиналах лидеры регулярного чемпионата легко переиграли своих соперников, и в финале встретились команды из одной конференции, поэтому на пост наставников сборных Востока и Запада решено было назначить наставников лучших клубов обеих конференций. Таким образом командой Запада руководила Шерил Рив, а у руля сборной Востока должен был встать Билл Лэймбир, впрочем он не смог исполнять свои обязанности по семейным обстоятельствам. Ко времени объявления имён главных тренеров на матч всех звёзд ЖНБА по проценту побед в регулярном сезоне Восточной конференции лидировала команда «Коннектикут Сан», поэтому место у руля команды Востока занял Курт Миллер, главный тренер «Коннектикута».

11 июля женская НБА опубликовала итоги голосования среди болельщиков на сайте ассоциации, по результатам которого наибольшее число голосов среди игроков Востока набрала Елена Делле Донн (31 414), а среди игроков Запада — Майя Мур (32 866). В итоге в стартовую пятёрку сборной Востока кроме Делле Донн попали Тина Чарльз, Джонквел Джонс, Тиффани Хейз и Жасмин Томас, а в стартовую пятёрку команды Запада кроме Мур вошли Кэндис Паркер (29 133), Сильвия Фаулз (24 904), Сью Бёрд (24 841) и Дайана Таурази.

18 июля были опубликованы итоги голосования среди главных тренеров команд ВНБА, по результатам которого резервистами Востока стали Кэндис Дюпри, Алисса Томас, Стефани Долсон, Элизабет Уильямс, Лейшия Кларендон и Элли Куигли. А запасными Запада стали Ннека Огвумике, Скайлар Диггинс, Бриттни Гринер, Челси Грей, Брианна Стюарт и Сеймон Огастус. Однако Делле Донн не смогла принять участие в этом матче, у которой была травмирована лодыжка, в результате этого образовавшееся вакантное место в стартовой пятёрке Востока заняла Алисса Томас. Гринер же из-за повреждения колена и голеностопного сустава тоже не смогла принять участие в этой встрече, поэтому образовавшиеся вакантные места среди резервистов заняли Ребекка Брансон и Шугар Роджерс.

По результатам голосования рекордный десятый раз на матч всех звёзд получила вызов Сью Бёрд, догнав по количеству включений лидировавшую до этого по этому показателю Тамику Кэтчингс, восьмой раз — Дайана Таурази, седьмой — Сеймон Огастус, шестой — Кэндис Дюпри, пятый — Майя Мур и Тина Чарльз и четвёртый — Кэндис Паркер, Сильвия Фаулз, Ннека Огвумике, Ребекка Брансон, Бриттни Гринер и Елена Делле Донн.

В данной таблице опубликованы полные составы сборных Запада и Востока предстоящего матча.

Первая половина встречи прошла в абсолютно равной борьбе, небольшое преимущество в игре переходило от Востока к Запада и наоборот, которое не превышало шести очков, и если одна из команд выходила вперёд, то другая сразу же догоняла соперника. Только за 3:44 до окончания первой четверти после точного броска со средней дистанции в исполнении Ннеки Огвумике сборной Запада удалось оторваться в счёте на восемь очков (25:17), а через минуту после броска Скайлар Диггинс разрыв в счёте достиг двузначного (29:19). Впрочем тут же команда Востока, усилиями Стефани Долсон, Элли Куигли и Кэндис Дюпри, набрала семь очков подряд и сократила своё отставание в счёте до трёх баллов (28:31). Концовка четверти опять лучше удалась сборной Запада, которая после точного броска Брианны Стюарт ушла на символический перерыв с пятиочковым преимуществом в счёте (35:30). Первая половина второго отрезка игры началась со стремительного рывка сборной Востока, которой постепенно удалось свести на нет достигнутое преимущество команды Запада и за 7:20 до её конца, после точного трёхочкового Джонквел Джонс, выйти вперёд 41:39. Впрочем постепенно сборной Запада удалось восстановить комфортный перевес в шесть очков и после удачного броска с дальней дистанции Сью Бёрд, за 4:26 до конца четверти, повести со счётом 50:44. Это превосходство команде Запада получалось сохранить почти до самого конца четверти и за 1:49 до большого перерыва, после точного броска Огвумике, ещё вести со счётом 62:57. Однако последние две минуты первой половины игры удачнее провела сборная Востока, сперва, после точного двухочкового Лейшии Кларендон, она сократила своё отставание до минимума (61:62), а после взятого Куртом Миллером тайм-аута, усилиями той же Кларендон из-за дуги, и вовсе сравняла счёт (64:64), при котором команды ушли на большой перерыв.

После большого перерыва обстановка на паркете не изменилась, первая половина третьей четверти прошла в абсолютно равной борьбе, большую часть которой с небольшим преимуществом лидировала команда Запада, однако её перевес не превышал трёх очков. Впрочем иногда вперёд выходила и сборная Востока усилиями Тины Чарльз и Элли Куигли, но тут же соперник забивал в ответ и перехватывал лидерство. Но постепенно инициатива в матче перешла на сторону сборной Запада, которая совершила два резких рывка вперёд, во время которых в основном солировали Стюарт и Огвумике. Сперва, за 2:54 до конца третьей четверти, она набрала четыре очка подряд, а затем, за 1:20 до свистка на символический перерыв, отметилась ещё восемью очками сразу, доведя разрыв на табло до двухзначного (91:81). Концовка третьего отрезка встречи ознаменовалась несколькими выпадами команд, в результате которых положение дел на площадке не изменилось (96:85). После официального тайм-аута команда Востока сразу же активизировалась и набрала за двадцать секунд пять очков кряду, тем самым сократив разрыв в счёте до шести очков (90:96), но тут же пропустила в ответ от той же Огвумике и Брансон ещё шесть очков (102:90). В дальнейшем сборной Запада удавалось удерживать команду Востока на почтительном расстоянии практически на протяжении всей четвёртой четверти, а если же Востоку иногда удавалось сократить разницу в счёте меньше десяти очков, то Запад тут же навёрстывал упущенное и восстанавливал статус-кво. А за 2:51 до финального свистка, после двух точных трёхочковых в исполнении Дайаны Таурази и Кэндис Паркер, разрыв в счёте достиг пятнадцати очков (121:106), после чего результат матча стал практически ясен. В течение следующих двух минут команда Запада удерживала пятнадцатиочковый разрыв на табло (130:115), впрочем в самой концовке последнего отрезка встречи немного расслабилась и позволила сборной Востока, усилиями Джонквел Джонс и Тиффани Хейз, сократить своё отставание до более приличного (121:130).

Самым ценным игроком этого матча была признана форвард «Миннесота Линкс» Майя Мур, которая набрала 23 очка, совершила 3 подбора и сделала 3 передачи и выиграла этот титул во второй игре кряду, тем самым повторив достижения Лизы Лесли (2001 и 2002) и Свин Кэш (2009 и 2011). Кроме того лучшими игроками этого матча, предопределившими победу команды Запада, стали Ннека Огвумике, набравшая 22 очка и совершившая 7 подборов, Кэндис Паркер, набравшая 13 очков и 7 подборов, Дайана Таурази, набравшая 12 очков и 5 передач и Ребекка Брансон, набравшая 12 очков и 3 подбора. Лучшими игроками Востока стали Джонквел Джонс, набравшая 24 очка и 9 подборов, Лейшия Кларендон, набравшая 14 очков и 10 передач, Кэндис Дюпри, набравшая 14 очков и 6 подборов, Элли Куигли, забившая 14 очков и Тиффани Хейз, набравшая 12 очков, 5 подборов и 4 передачи.

В данной таблице показан подробный статистический анализ этого матча.

Звёзды Западной конференции

Звёзды Восточной конференции

В ежегодном соревновании по трёхочковым броскам (англ. WNBA 3-Point Shootout Challenge) принимали участие пять игроков. В этом году в нём участвовали: первые номера драфта ВНБА 2002 и 2011 годов Сью Бёрд и Майя Мур, а также три дебютанта матча всех звёзд Элли Куигли, Шугар Роджерс и Жасмин Томас. По правилам этого конкурса претендент должен реализовать столько трёхочковых попыток насколько возможно из пяти различных позиций в течение одной минуты. Каждый игрок начинает кидать из одного угла площадки, постепенно перемещаясь от «точки» к «точке» по трёхочковой дуге, пока не достигнет противоположного края паркета. На каждой «точке» игроку предоставляется четыре мяча, каждое попадание оценивается в одно очко, плюс есть специальный «призовой мяч», достоинством в 2 балла. Конкурс прошёл в субботу, 22 июля 2017 года, в 4:30 дня по Североамериканскому восточному времени (ET), во время большого перерыва матча всех звёзд.

В первом раунде победила Шугар Роджерс, набрав 22 очка из 30 возможных. Кроме неё во второй раунд также прошла Элли Куигли, а Майя Мур, Жасмин Томас и Сью Бёрд выступили намного хуже своих соперниц по первому этапу и не прошли в финальный раунд. В финале уже лучшей стала Куигли, набрав 27 очков, на семь больше, чем в первом раунде, и тем самым побив на два балла рекорд конкурса, который в 2007 году установила Лори Кейн из «Вашингтон Мистикс». Роджерс же выступила хуже, чем на первом этапе, набрав всего 19 очков.

Bobby Lalonde

Posted by admin on August 13, 2018 in Uncategorized |

Robert Patrick Lalonde (born March 27, 1951 in Montreal, Quebec) is a retired professional ice hockey player drafted 17th overall in the second round of the 1971 NHL entry draft. He played 641 games in the National Hockey League from 1971 to 1982. During his career he accumulated 124 goals, 210 assists for a total of 334 points. He played for the Vancouver Canucks, Atlanta Flames, Boston Bruins, and a short stint with the Calgary Flames until his eventual retirement due to a recurring knee injury. Bobby Lalonde was listed at 5’5″ and was the shortest player to play in the NHL at that time.

He now resides on the outskirts of Toronto, Ontario, with his wife Carolyn. He has two sons. Brent, the eldest, was born while he was playing for the Vancouver Canucks and his younger son Court was born while he was playing for the Atlanta Flames.

Lalonde’s amateur career began with the Ontario Hockey Association’s Montreal Junior Canadiens, for whom he played from 1968 to 1971, earning 255 points in combined goals and assists. The Junior Canadiens won the Memorial Cup twice during Lalonde’s tenure there, once in 1969 and again the following year.

Lalonde turned pro in 1971, joining the National Hockey League’s Vancouver Canucks as their number two draft choice. He netted 1 goal and 5 assists in 27 games with the Canucks prior to being sent to their American Hockey League affiliate Rochester Americans for the remainder of the season. Lalonde skated with the Americans for 42 games, tallying 25 points in goals and assists. The following season Lalonde skated with the Canucks, where he remained until 1977. He spent nearly half of the 1973–74 season out of play due to an ankle injury. During the 1975–76 and 1976–77 seasons, Lalonde briefly played for the Central Hockey League’s Tulsa Oilers. All told, Lalonde netted 189 points in combined goals and assists in 353 games with the Canucks.

In October 1977, Lalonde (then a free agent) was picked up by the Atlanta Flames. Lalonde remained with the Flames through 1979, scoring 38 goals and 56 assists in 154 games.

Lalonde was traded to the Boston Bruins in exchange for future considerations in October 1979. He found himself playing for Fred Creighton, who had coached him previously in Atlanta. He spent the bulk of the 1979–80 and 1980–81 seasons in Boston, tallying 14 goals and 37 assists in 133 games.

In October 1981, the Bruins bought out the remaining year of Lalonde’s contract and released him as a free agent. Lalonde returned to the NHL on a minor-league contract with the Calgary Flames, playing 19 games with the CHL’s Oklahoma City Stars and 1 game with the Flames. He then moved to the European leagues, playing 15 games with HC Davos of the Swiss National League A before retiring from professional hockey in 1982.

Gajan (Gard)

Posted by admin on August 13, 2018 in Uncategorized |

Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant (comment ?). Le bandeau {{ébauche}} peut être enlevé et l’article évalué comme étant au stade « Bon début » quand il comporte assez de renseignements encyclopédiques concernant la commune.
Si vous avez un doute, l’atelier de lecture du projet Communes de France est à votre disposition pour vous aider. Consultez également la page d’aide à la rédaction d’un article de commune.

Géolocalisation sur la carte : Gard

Géolocalisation sur la carte : Gard

Géolocalisation sur la carte : France

Géolocalisation sur la carte : France

Gajan est une commune française située dans le département du Gard, en région Occitanie.

Les communes de Nîmes, Parignargues, Saint-Mamert, Fons, Saint-Bauzély et La Rouvière sont limitrophes de la commune de Gajan.

Gajan est l’une des 79 communes membres du schéma de cohérence territoriale (SCOT) du Sud du Gard (voir lien) et fait également partie des 41 communes du pays Garrigues et Costières de Nîmes.

Occitan Gajan, du bas latin Gajanum, Gaianum.

Ses habitants s’appellent les Gajanais et Gajanaises.

On trouve une première mention du village sous le nom de Gaians en 957 dans le cartulaire de Notre-Dame de Nîmes.

Situé sur le passage d’une voie romaine, le château fut donné en 1211 à l’évêque d’Uzès par Philippe Auguste.

La commune a engagé une politique de développement durable en lançant une démarche d’Agenda 21.

L’évolution du nombre d’habitants est connue à travers les recensements de la population effectués dans la commune depuis 1793. À partir de 2006, les populations légales des communes sont publiées annuellement par l’Insee. Le recensement repose désormais sur une collecte d’information annuelle, concernant successivement tous les territoires communaux au cours d’une période de cinq ans. Pour les communes de moins de 10 000 habitants, une enquête de recensement portant sur toute la population est réalisée tous les cinq ans, les populations légales des années intermédiaires étant quant à elles estimées par interpolation ou extrapolation. Pour la commune, le premier recensement exhaustif entrant dans le cadre du nouveau dispositif a été réalisé en 2005.

En 2015, la commune comptait 679 habitants, en diminution de 3,41 % par rapport à 2010 (Gard : +4,01 %, France hors Mayotte : +2,44 %).

Le château.

Vue du village en hiver de la route D 907. Dominant le village, on peut reconnaître la tour du premier château. Plus sur la droite, on voit l’église, puis la tour du second château.

Cliquez sur une image pour l’agrandir, ou survolez-la pour afficher sa légende.


Cliquez sur une image pour l’agrandir, ou survolez-la pour afficher sa légende.

Sur les autres projets Wikimedia :

Administration régionale Kativik

Posted by admin on August 13, 2018 in Uncategorized |

Si vous disposez d’ouvrages ou d’articles de référence ou si vous connaissez des sites web de qualité traitant du thème abordé ici, merci de compléter l’article en donnant les références utiles à sa vérifiabilité et en les liant à la section « Notes et références »

En pratique : Quelles sources sont attendues ? Comment ajouter mes sources ?

Géolocalisation sur la carte : Canada

Géolocalisation sur la carte : Canada

Le Kativik (inuktitut : ᑲᑎᕕᒃ), officiellement Administration régionale Kativik (ARK), est un territoire de niveau supralocal qui couvre entièrement le Nunavik, au Québec (Canada). Il englobe toute la portion au nord du 55e parallèle à l’exception des terres cries de Whapmagoostui.

Kativik est un toponyme d’origine inuite signifiant « endroit où l’on va pour se rassembler » de kati, « aller se rassembler », et vik, « endroit ».

Créée en 1978, en vertu de la Convention de la Baie-James et du Nord québécois, l’Administration régionale Kativik représente tous les habitants de la région, inuits et naskapi. L’ARK est financée par le gouvernement du Québec (50 %) et le gouvernement du Canada (25 %).[réf. nécessaire]

Son chef-lieu est le village nordique de Kuujjuaq, sur le fleuve Koksoak, au sud de la baie d’Ungava. La superficie est de 500 164 km2, avec 13 188 habitants en 2016.

Le directeur général de l’Administration régionale Kativik est Michael Gordon et la présidente du Conseil est Jennifer Munick.

Le service de police est assuré par le Corps de police régional Kativik.

L’administration régionale Kativik compte :

Le village cri de Whapmagoostui, près du village nordique Kuujjuarapik, sur la baie d’Hudson, est une enclave qui ne fait pas partie de l’ARK. Whapmagoostui (village et terres réservées : 316 km2) fait partie de l’Administration régionale crie et du Grand Conseil des Cris (Eeyou Istchee).

À Kativik, selon l’Institut de la statistique du Québec, la langue la plus parlée le plus souvent à la maison en 2011 sur une population de 16 320 habitants, est l’inuktitut, à 86,01% ; l’anglais, à 7,76% ; et le français, à 5,65%.

La Société Makivik représente les Inuits du Nunavik auprès des gouvernements du Québec et du Canada. Elle a son siège social à Kuujjuaq, est en faveur d’une plus grande autonomie politique pour la région du Nunavik.

Jonathan Fagerlund

Posted by admin on August 13, 2018 in Uncategorized |

Jonathan Fagerlund (born 8 January 1991), sometimes just Jonathan, is a Swedish singer. He has released two albums Flying and Welcome to My World and five singles. He is signed to Dreamline Music record label. In 2009, he took part in Melodifestivalen with the song “Welcome to My Life”. Before his solo career, he had taken part in a television series and was, for a brief time, a member of Streetwize, an international boy band project.

Fagerlund was born in Jönköping. In 2004, at the age of 13, he took part in Super Troupers on Sweden’s TV4 television station. He finished fifth overall out of 10 finalists with the song “This is the Moment / Nu eller aldrig”

In 2005, he joined the international boy band project called Streetwize, alongside Lee Mulhern (later known as Lee Matthews), Donal Skehan and Lee Hutton. He toured with the group in the United Kingdom, Ireland, United States and Sweden. The original members appeared on the US television station CN8, a cable television station where they performed “Room in Your Heart” in a morning show hosted by Greg Coy. But disappointed by the slow progress of the group project, he decided to leave the band Streetwize and return to his homeland and start a solo musical career.

He released his debut album, Flying, in 2008 with collaborations from producers and songwriters Samuel Waermö, Andreas Carlsson and Savan Kotecha. His first ever official single was “Angeline”. It had heavy air play on Swedish pop radio stations, but failed to chart. The next single released in Sweden, “Playing Me”, released in February 2008 and topped at No. 4 for two consecutive weeks in the Swedish Singles Chart in March 2008. A third single followed in 2008 “Dance in the Shadows”. Jonathan went on tour with Nickelodeon for their highly popular summer music festival.

Jonathan also took part in the 2009 series of Melodifestivalen with the new song “Welcome to My Life” written by Samuel Waermö and Didrik Thott Jonathan in a bid to represent Sweden in the Eurovision Song Contest 2009 held in Moscow, Russia. The Swedish contest was won by the soprano Malena Ernman. In his second album Welcome to My World, he collaborated with Alice Svensson, a childhood friend and Idol 2008 runner-up in the song “Save Our Yesterdays”.

In 2010s, Fagerlund started working as a training instructor in a fitness gym in Stockholm.

Маслово (Козельский район)

Posted by admin on August 13, 2018 in Uncategorized |

Маслово — деревня в Козельском районе Калужской области. Входит в состав Сельского поселения «Село Нижние Прыски».

Расположено на левом берегу реки Серёна, на противоположном берегу — деревня Серено-Завод. Маслово находится примерно в 7 км к северу от села Нижние Прыски.

На 2010 год население составляло 3 человек.

Районный центр: Козельск
Аграфеновка • Акатово • Алешня • Антипово • Берды • Березичи • Березичская Школа-Интернат • Березичский Стеклозавод • Бильдино • Бобровка • Богдановка • Булатово • Бурнашево • Бутырки • Ваниловка • Васильевка • Вербы • Верхнее Дерягино • Верхние Прыски • Волковынка • Волконское • Волосово-Звягино • Вырск • Вязовая • Глупеево • Городец • Гранный Холм • Грачёвский • Грива • Гришинск • Грязна • Губино • Гутнево • Дементеевка • Дерибино • Дешовки • Дмитровский • Дол • Дракуны • Дубновичи • Дубровка • Дубровка • Егорье • Егорье • Егорьевский • Ерлыково • Жильково • Завалихино • Запрудное • Заречье • Заречье • Зарочино • Звягино • Зелёные Воды • Ивановское • Ильинское • Истик • Калинино • Каменка • Каретный • Каторгинка Вторая • Каторгинка Первая • Киреевское Второе • Киреевское Первое • Кленовка • Клыково • Клюксы • Копаново • Коробки • Костешово • Красная Дубрава • Красный Клин • Криуша • Кричина • Кстищи • Кузьменки • Кулешовка • Куровское • Курыничи • Лавровск • Ленинский • Лубны • Лужнево • Марьино • Маслово • Матчино • Нелюбовка • Немысино • Нешенка • Нижнее Дерягино • Нижние Прыски • Новое Казачье • Новосёлки • Новосёлки • Новоселье • Овсянниково • Озёрское • Ольховка • Орденки • Орлово Второе • Орлово Первое • Отрада • Павлово • Пальна • Парфёново • Перестромы • Петелино • Петрищенки • Петровск • Плюсково • Побуж • Поветкино • Подборки • Покровка • Покровск • Полошково • Попелёво • Потросово • Прилипки • Пронино • Пятовка • Ратный • Редково • Рогачи • Родная Слободка • Рождествено • Романовское • Рубцы • Руднево • Рудневский • Рядики • Рядинки • Савинск • Сбылево • Село Грязненского Лесничества • Село Клыковского отделения Совхоза «Красный Плодовод» • Сенино-Второе • Сенино-Первое • Серено-Завод • Сеславль • Сикерки • Славышено • Слаговищи • Слаговищи • Слепцово • Слепцовское Отделение • Слобода • Сосенка • Сосенский • Средний • Староселье • Стенино • Тарачки • Толстое • Торбеево • Трошна • Тычково • Усово • Уткино • Феофиловка • Фроловское • Хлыстово • Хозцы • Хотенка • Хряпкино • Чернышено • Шамордино • Шамординский • Шемякино • Шепелевка • Шепелево • Юдинки • Юрино • Юрмановка

Atlantas Klaipėda

Posted by admin on August 11, 2018 in Uncategorized |

FK Atlantas Klaipėda is een Litouwse voetbalclub uit de stad Klaipėda.

De club werd in 1962 opgericht als Granitas en was vrij succesvol in de Litouwse competitie ten tijde van de Sovjet-Unie, toen dit een lagere klasse was in het Sovjet-systeem. De titel werd vier keer gehaald. De club was medeoprichter van de hoogste klasse na de onafhankelijkheid van Litouwen en speelt sindsdien onafgebroken in deze reeks.

In het eerste seizoen 1990 werd de club (toen nog Granitas) vicekampioen. De volgende seizoenen verdween de club in de middenmoot. In 1993 werd de naam PSK Aras. In 1996 ging Sirijus Klaipėda op in de club en de naam werd Atlantas. In 1999 werden ze derde. Ook het daaropvolgende seizoen werd Atlantas derde, in 2001 en 2002 werd opnieuw de vicetitel behaald, in 2001 won de club ook de beker. Na een derde plaats in 2004 zakte de club qua positie in de latere jaren.

Op 20 maart 2009 trok de club zich terug voor de A Lyga en werd door de Litouwse voetbalbond terug verwezen daar de derde divisie. In 2014 keerde de club terug op het hoogste niveau.

Geel shirt, blauwe broek en gele sokken.

Away witte shirts en blauwe korte broek.

#Q = # voorronde, #R = #ronde, PUC = punten UEFA coëfficiënten

Totaal aantal punten voor UEFA coëfficiënten: 1.0

Atlantas · Jonava · Kauno Žalgiris · Stumbras · Sūduva Marijampolė · Trakai · Palanga · Žalgiris

J. D. Crowe

Posted by admin on August 11, 2018 in Uncategorized |

James Dee „J.D.“ Crowe (* 27. August 1937 in Lexington, Kentucky) ist ein US-amerikanischer Country-Musiker, Banjospieler und Wegbereiter eines progressiven Bluegrass-Stils.

Als Jugendlicher hatte J.D. Crowe mehrfach Gelegenheit, sein großes Idol, den Banjo-Spieler Earl Scruggs, bei Konzerten aus nächster Nähe zu beobachten. Crowe nutzte diese Gelegenheiten, um seinen eigenen Banjo-Stil zu perfektionieren. Er spielte in verschiedenen lokalen Bluegrassgruppen und trat häufig im Radio auf.

1956 hörte der renommierte Country-Musiker Jimmy Martin bei einer Durchfahrt durch Lexington zufällig eine Live-Darbietung Crowes im Autoradio. Er war so beeindruckt, dass er zum Sender fuhr und dem jungen Talent das Angebot machte, in seine Begleitband, die Sunny Mountain Boys, einzutreten. Crowe sagte zu und arbeitete anschließend sechs Jahre mit Martin zusammen.

Ende der 1960er Jahre gründete Crowe die Kentucky Mountain Boys, die modernen Bluegrass spielten und drei Alben veröffentlichten. 1971 formierte er die Band New South, die 1975 das Album J.D. Crowe and The New South einspielte. Es gilt als eines der wichtigsten Werke des neu entstandenen Progressive Bluegrass und war kommerziell überdurchschnittlich erfolgreich. Beteiligt waren einige hochtalentierte Nachwuchsmusiker, die später selbst Karriere machen sollten: Tony Rice, Ricky Skaggs und Jerry Douglas.

1980 gründete er gemeinsam mit Tony Rice, Bobby Hicks, Doyle Lawson und Todd Phillips die Supergroup Bluegrass Album Band, die sich in größeren Zeitabständen zum gemeinsamen Musizieren traf. Bis 1996 wurden insgesamt sechs Alben produziert, die von Bluegrass Album, Vol. 1 bis Bluegrass Album, Vol. 6 durchnummeriert wurden. Seine eigene Band New South existierte in ständig wechselnder Besetzung weiter. Herausragende Mitglieder waren Dwight McCall, Jimmy Gaudreau, Ron Stewart und Keith Whitley.

2001 wurde Crowe zum Namensgeber und der Hauptattraktion des The J.D. Crowe Festivals, das alljährlich in der Nähe seiner Geburtsstadt Lexington stattfindet.

Nijmegen railway station

Posted by admin on August 11, 2018 in Uncategorized |

Nijmegen is the main railway station of Nijmegen, Netherlands. It was opened on 9 August 1865 and is located on the Tilburg–Nijmegen railway, Nijmegen–Venlo railway and the Arnhem–Nijmegen railway. It was extensively rebuilt after the war since the original station was severely damaged by a US bombing raid in February 1944 and during Operation Market Garden in September 1944. Until 1991 there was a line into Germany from here to Kleve.

The train services are operated by Nederlandse Spoorwegen and Arriva. The station is a central station for the whole area and is a busy interchange station.

As of 11 December 2016, the following train services call at this station:

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines operates a bus from the train station to Schiphol Airport for KLM customers.

There is also an express bus service SB 58, operated by the German company NIAG to the German towns of Kranenburg, Kleve and Emmerich. The bus can be used with both Dutch OV-chipkaarts and German Verkehrsverbund Rhein-Ruhr tickets on the whole length of the route.

Breng is the main operator of local and regional bus services in the region, while Arriva also has one service connecting Nijmegen with Limburg.

Copyright © 2015-2018 Hermes Tassen Online,Enorme Korting. All rights reserved.

Kelme Outlet | Le Coq Sport Outlet

kelme paul frank outlet new balance outlet bogner outlet le coq sportif outlet hermes tassen hermes birkin hermes online shop